Sunday, June 2, 2013

Ten Young African Millionaires To Watch

There’s no money like young money.
While African millionaires and billionaires like Onsi Sawiris,Raymond AckermanAliko Dangoteand Deinde Fernandez may have more money than most of us can ever dream of, there’s one thing they can never buy: Youth. Even money has its limits.
But there are a handful of young Africans in their 20s and 30s who have built businesses and amassed enviable million-dollar fortunes. Call them million-dollar babies. While some are corporate animals; others are empire builders- like Ladi Delano, the restless 30 year-old Nigerian entrepreneur who founded Solid XS, a hugely successful premium Vodka business in China when he was barely 23 years old. He subsequently flipped his vodka company for millions of dollars. Today, he is a co-founder and CEO of Bakrie Delano Africa, a $1 billion investment vehicle committed to making acquisitions in Nigeria’s mining, energy and agriculture sectors.
There are thousands of young and immensely successful entrepreneurs across the African continent.  There’s a growing number of Africans aged 40 and under who are legitimately amassing multi-million dollar fortunes. They don’t inherit stuff; they build it themselves.
Here are ten you need to know:
Mark Shuttleworth, South African
Age: 38
Founder, Knife Capital
When Shuttleworth was 22, he founded Thawte, a digital certificate and internet security company which he sold to VeriSign for $575 million in 1999, when he was 26. Shuttleworth used a fraction of his proceeds to start HBD Capital (now called Knife Capital), a Cape Town-based emerging markets investment fund. HBD has made a series of successful exits including Fundamo, a mobile financial services company which was acquired byVisa for $110 million in 2011; and csense, which was acquired by GE Intelligent Platforms the same year.  Shuttleworth also founded and funds Ubuntu, a computer operating system which he distributes as free open source software. Shuttleworth has a net worth north of $500 million.
Ashish Thakkar, Ugandan
Age: 29
Co-Founder and CEO, Mara Group
Thakkar, 29 is a co-founder and CEO of Mara Group – a Ugandan conglomerate with tentacles in financial services, hotels, renewable energy, technology and manufacturing. Annual revenues are approximately $100 million and the group has an active presence in 16 countries on four continents. Devoted philanthropist: Through his Mara Foundation, Thakkar provides mentorship and seed funding to young East African entrepreneurs. Also funds Next Generation Schools, an independent charity focused on improving education quality in disadvantaged secondary schools in Uganda. The Mara Group recently signed a $300 million deal with the Tanzanian government to develop a 3.5 million square foot state of the art mini-city.
Ladi Delano, Nigerian
Age: 30
Founder and CEO, Bakrie Delano Africa
The jet-setting Nigerian serial entrepreneur made his first millions as a liquor entrepreneur while living in China. In 2004, at age 22, he founded Solidarnosc Asia, a Chinese alcoholic beverage company that made Solid XS, a premium brand of vodka. Solid XS went on to achieve over 50% market share in China and was distributed across over 30 cities in China, and pulled in $20 million in annual revenue. Delano subsequently sold the company to a rival liquor company for over $15 million and ploughed his funds into his next venture-The Delano Reid Group, a real estate investment holding company focused on mainland China.  Today, Delano is the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Bakrie Delano Africa (BDA) – a $1 billion joint venture with the $15 billion (market cap) Bakrie Group of Indonesia. Bakrie Delano Africa serves as the investment partner of the Bakrie Group in Nigeria. The Indonesian conglomerate has provided over $900 million worth of funds to invest in Nigeria and Bakrie Delano Africa is responsible for identifying investment opportunities in mining, agriculture and oil & gas and executing them.
Justin Stanford, South African
Age: 28
Founder & CEO, 4Di Group
South African-born Stanford is a software entrepreneur and venture capitalist. After dropping out off high school, Stanford set out to launch an internet security company which flopped.  When he came across ESET, a Slovakian anti-virus software package, he negotiated with its manufacturers and cornered the exclusive, lucrative Southern African distribution for the product. Today, Stanford’s ESET Southern Africa operates the ESET brand in the region and sells ESET’s range of internet security products in about 20 sub-Saharan countries, leveraging on an extremely successful internet business platform and digital distribution model for online software sales and service. Today, Stanford’s ESET brand records over $10 million in annual turnover and controls 5% of the anti-virus market in Southern Africa. Stanford is also the founding partner of 4Di Capital, a Cape Town-based venture capital fund. Stanford is also a co-founder of theSilicon Cape Initiative, a non-profit movement that aims to turn the Cape into Africa’s own Silicon Valley.
Magatte Wade, Senegalese
Age: 36
Founder, Adina World Beat Beverages & Tiossan
In 2004 Magatte Wade founded Adina World Beat Beverages, aSan Francisco beverage company that manufactures coffee, tea and fruit juices using traditional beverage recipes across Africa and organic ingredients sourced from smallholder farmers in Africa and Asia. Within five years of launching, Adina raised over $30 million in venture capital from institutional investors and the products began being sold by Whole Foods and United Natural Foods. Magatte stepped down from her position as CEO to grow her second company, Tiossan, a manufacturer of luxury skin care products based on indigenous Senegalese recipes.
Mike Macharia, Kenyan
Age: 36
Founder & CEO, Seven Seas Technologies
When he was 25, Macharia, a Kenyan national, founded Seven Seas Technology, now easily East Africa’s most reputable IT services firm.  The $50 million (annual sales) company is a leading provider of integrated business and technology solutions across Africa in the telecom, financial, Real Estate, service industry and government. Seven Seas is gearing up to get listed on the Nairobi Stock Exchange next year.
Vinny Lingham, South African
Age: 33
Founder, Yola Inc
Lingham, a South African national, is the founder ofYola Inc, a San Francisco-based Web 2.0 outfit that provides free website building, publishing and hosting services to over 3 million active users across the globe. Yola has attracted over $30 million in venture capital financing from institutional investors such as Columbus Venture Capital, a subsidiary of South African billionaire Johann Rupert’s Richemont Group. Prior to Yola, Lingham founded Click2Customers, a hugely successful search engine marketing company with offices in London, Cape Town, and Los Angeles.  Click2Customers rakes in about $100 million in annual revenues. Lingham is a co-founder of the Silicon Cape Initiative along with fellow South African entrepreneur Justin Stanford.
Kamal Budhabatti, Kenyan
Age: 36
Kamal is the founder and CEO of Craft Silicon, a $50 million (market value) Kenyan software company which provides software in core banking, microfinance, mobile, switch solutions and electronic payments for over 200 institutional clients in 40 countries spread across four continents.
Yolanda Cuba, South African
Age: 35
Executive Director, South African Breweries
One of just two women to make it to this list. When Yolanda Cuba was 29 she was appointed CEO of Mvelaphanda Holdings, a Johannesburg Stock Exchange-listed investment holding company. She was awarded stock options worth over $10 million which she exercised before stepping down as CEO last year. She subsequently took up a job as an Executive Director at South African Breweries.  Cuba still serves on the boards of South African blue chips such as Steinhoff International Holdings and Absa Group.
Jason Njoku, Nigerian
Age: 31
Founder & CEO Iroko TV
The maverick Nigerian Internet entrepreneur is founder of Iroko TV, the world’s largest digital distributor of African movies. Iroko TV has been dubbed the ‘Netflix of Africa’. Earlier this year, Iroko TV raised $8 million in venture capital from Tiger Global Management, a New York-based private equity and hedge fund run by billionaire Chase Coleman. IrokoTV enjoys lucrative content distribution deals with Dailymotion, iTunes, Amazon and Vimeo. Njoku is unwilling to divulge figures, but analysts believe IrokoTV could be worth as much as $30 million. Njoku is the company’s largest individual shareholder.
Forbes.com

Aliko Dangote Is Africa's First $20 Billion Man

Aliko Dangote
Aliko Dangote


Nigerian billionaire and Africa’s richest man Aliko Dangote has become the first African entrepreneur to lay claim to a $20 billion fortune as the stock value of his largest holding, Dangote Cement, leaped just about three-fourths since March when Forbesreleased its annual ranking of the world’s richest people.
Aliko Dangote’s 93% stake in the cement company is now worth $19.5 billion. Add this to his controlling stakes in other publicly-listed companies like Dangote Sugar and National Salt Company of Nigeria and his significant shareholdings in other blue-chips like Zenith Bank, UBA Group and Dangote Flour; his extensive real estate portfolio, jets, yachts and current cash position, which includes more than $300 million in recently awarded Dangote Cement dividends, Dangote is now worth more than $20 billion.
Put into context, the Nigerian billionaire is now among the top 25 richest people in the world, richer than Russia’s richest man, Alisher Usmanov, richer than India’s Lakshmi Mittal and running neck and neck with India’s Mukesh Ambani. He is catching up to such Americans as Google’s billionaire founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin.
The unprecedented surge in Dangote Cement’s share price is largely a market response to the company’s impressive 2013 Q1 results.
The cement manufacturer’s unaudited results for the three months ending March 31 showed that the company’s pre-tax profit rose to $339 million, representing an 80.6% increase from last year and a strong indicator of the company’s future earning potential. The results also indicate a 79.5 % rise in its earnings per share over the corresponding period last year.
Explaining the company’s share price boost in an email to Forbes, Carl Franklin, Dangote Cement’s Head of Investor Relations in the U.K said that in the first quarter of 2013, the company had a huge increase in demand across Nigeria, gas supply improved considerably and the capacity was much more ramped up.
“So Q1 was the first sign of just how profitable we can be in Nigeria. The amazing thing is that 66% of our gas-fired production in Q1 was done at 84% gas. Imagine what would happen to margins if we did the same amount at 95%. This has given investors a good sense of what we can really do when everything goes in the right direction,” Franklin said.
With a current market cap of $20.5 billion, Dangote Cement becomes the first Nigerian company to achieve a market capitalization of over $20 billion.
“It’s certainly a landmark for a Nigerian company and we’re proud to be the first to achieve it. Obviously we are focusing on building long-term and sustainable value for shareholders through our investments in Nigeria and Africa. Nigeria is a very entrepreneurial country and I can assure you that other companies will follow us in achieving this.”
Other companies might eventually achieve this, but it’s going to take a bit of time. Dangote Cement currently accounts for more than a quarter of the total market capitalization of the Nigerian Stock Exchange. The second largest company on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) is currently Nigerian Breweries, West Africa’s largest manufacturer of Alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. The company has a market cap of $8.5 billion.
Dangote debuted on the FORBES billionaires list in 2008 with a fortune we pegged at $3.3 billion. His fortune dropped to $2.5 billion in 2009 and plunged further to $2.1 billion in 2010. His fortune surged  557% in 2011 to $13.8 billion after he took Dangote Cement public. He dropped to $11.2 billion in last year’s rankings, but rebounded at $16.1 billion this year. Since March, his fortune has jumped another 30%.
Dangote was destined to shine in business. At age 8, he apparently gave packets of sweets he had made to the house servants to sell for him. His father Mohammed Dangote was a successful businessman and an associate of his maternal uncle Alhaji Sanusi Dantata. Dantata and his brother controlled the trade in kola nuts and livestock conducted by 200 agents. Dangote started building his fortune over three decades ago after taking a loan from Sanusi Dantata. He started trading in commodities like flour, sugar and cement.
He became a billionaire by later manufacturing these items. He started making pasta, salt, sugar and flour in 1997. But he found his gold mine in cement, when he was awarded a government’s state owned cement business in 2000 and began building his own plant in 2003. He listed Dangote Cement in 2010.
Today, it is Africa’s largest cement company providing cement to Nigeria and other African countries that otherwise would likely have to pay to import much of the materials.
Dangote still likely has bigger ambitions. He told Forbes Wealth Editor Luisa Kroll at Davos in 2011 that he expected his firm to have a market cap of $60 billion within five years. At $20.5 billion, Dangote Cement still has a long way to go to live up to that dream, and while it is quite unlikely that Dangote Cement could hit a $60 billion Market Cap by 2016, don’t write it off as ‘impossible’. With Dangote, you never know.
Forbes.com

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Lisa Bu: How books can open your mind (Transcript)

Compare and contrast gives scholars a more complete understanding of a topic. So I thought, well, if comparative reading works for research, why not do it in daily life too? So I started reading books in pairs. So they can be about people -- ["Benjamin Franklin" by Walter Isaacson] ["John Adams" by David McCullough] -- who are involved in the same event, or friends with shared experiences. ["Personal History" by Katharine Graham] ["The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life," by Alice Schroeder] I also compare the same stories in different genres -- (Laughter) [Holy Bible: King James Version] ["Lamb" by Chrisopher Moore] -- or similar stories from different cultures, as Joseph Campbell did in his wonderful book. ["The Power of Myth" by Joseph Campbell] For example, both the Christ and the Buddha went through three temptations. For the Christ, the temptations are economic, political and spiritual. For the Buddha, they are all psychological: lust, fear and social duty -- interesting.
ted.com

How Samsung Got Big

samsung








The cellphones were stacked up high in the Gumi factory yard and more were coming out every minute. Phones, TVs, fax machines, and other gear shattered as it hit the concrete and Samsung CEO Kun-hee Lee and his board cracked the screens and cases with heavy hammers. Then they lit a bonfire and threw everything in.
Lee Kun-Hee Net WorthSamsung CEO Kun-hee Lee
The 2,000 workers began to cry. And still the hardware kept coming. The CEO was disgusted by the low quality product coming out of his factories in the early 1990s and, in a blaze of anger, ordered it all destroyed.
In all, something like $50 million worth of hardware burned on one day in 1995 when Samsung hoisted its “Quality First” banner and began its slow march towards world domination in earnest. Samsung Electronics emerged from those ashes a very different company, but the road leading to that cleansing fire was a long one.
To most of the western world the name “Samsung” is inextricably linked with smartphones and televisions and refrigerators and microwaves — with the consumer electronics that have turned Samsung into a global force. Go back far enough though and it becomes very clear that Samsung Electronics was only ever part of the equation. A massively successful part, yes, but still just a part.
Before Samsung Electronics there was merely Samsung Sanghoe: a small trading company founded by Lee Byung-chull in 1938 that dealt mostly in dried seafood, produce, and its own noodles. Its bread and butter, so to speak, was shipping those comestibles all around Southeast Asia. Business was good, and Lee went on to open Samsung Mulsan (now known as Samsung Corporation) in 1948, but that prosperity was ultimately short-lived. After diligently growing Samsung Mulsan, Lee was forced to abandon his holdings in Seoul when the city was invaded and occupied by the republic’s communist neighbors to the north.
Lee Byung-chull
He nearly lost everything.
Samsung’s story almost ended there, but Lee made his way south to Pusan to recoup from his losses and bring Samsung Mulsan back from the brink of death. The war economy treated the fledgling trading corporation well, and within a few years Lee was able to parlay the proceeds into a handful of prominent subsidiaries.
And thus, Samsung’s chaebol era began. Korea’s chaebols are curious things — they’re very large, very diverse commercial conglomerates, not entirely unlike a GE or a Dupont, save for one little difference. Rather than divvying up the leadership of the chaebol’s subsidiaries and interests among a slew of external candidates, all that power is saved and meted out to members of the family. If you think of them as Asian analogues to family-driven empires like the Rockefellers you wouldn’t be completely off-base, but even that would be underestimating the amazing amount of political clout and influence these corporate bodies exhibit. In later years, the sort of influence chaebols had on national matters was even a little scary.
Lee Byung Chull sat in the throne, and over the years to come, most of his six daughters and four sons would occupy positions of great power with the carefully-cultivated chaebol. But none would be as prominent as Lee’s youngest son Kun-hee, who officially joined the chaebol in 1968 after studying economics at Japan’s prestigious Waseda University and getting his MBA from George Washington University.
1969 saw the founding of Samsung Electronics, the subsidiary that would ultimately go on to become perhaps the world’s most powerful electronics brand. But that’s a long way off — its first products were mostly modest home appliances. Samsung’s inaugural black-and-white television set rolled off assembly lines in 1969 by way of a joint venture with Sanyo since the Korean subsidiary had no experience putting TVs together, and refrigerators, air conditioners, and electric fans soon followed.
It didn’t take long for Lee to figure out that the growing demand for consumer electronics of all stripes could mean very big things for Samsung down the road, but there was a problem — many of the components that went into Samsung’s products came from overseas, and Japan in particular. Considering that Japanese companies like Sony had been churning out well-received gizmos for years at that point, nascent Korean electronics companies had grown dependent on imports of foreign components and technological know-how.
Samsung decided to do something about that. In 1974 it nabbed a majority stake in Korea Semiconductor in a bid to help wean itself off of foreign tech. Not everyone within Samsung’s brass agreed with the decision — granted, going from piecing together consumer electronics to building components seems slightly backwards — so Byung Chull decided to settle matters with his own checkbook with some prodding from his son Kun-hee. Korea Semiconductor was renamed Samsung Semiconductor in 1978 and Samsung would soon begin to sling its own silicon, a move that would pay off handsomely in the decades to come.
The rest of the 1970s would see Samsung Electronics making strides abroad with its inexpensive wares. One of its earliest international hits was a cheap color television — it first made a splash in Panama of all places before making its debut in the United States. It was a slow start, but a start all the same. Black and white sets hadn’t gone completely out of style yet though, and Samsung Electronics had manufactured almost 10 million of its cost-conscious sets by the end of the decade.**
By the time 1980 rolled around, the Samsung Group had grown to become one of the most prominent chaebols in South Korea, with a construction company, a petrochemicals division, and a ship-building arm supplementing the conglomerate’s sugar, paper, and newspaper businesses.
While the Samsung Group broadened its scope and grew into an economic powerhouse, Samsung Electronics slowly became more proficient at churning out consumer gadgetry. Even so, pure production power just wasn’t enough — even though Samsung had become a notable electronics exporter, foreign customers still passed over their products because of poor marketing and positioning. Who would buy a off-brand Samsung television when a proven Sony set sat right next to it on store shelves? Even worse, foreign and domestic consumers who did take a chance on Samsung products often found that they just didn’t work the way they were supposed to. The quality just wasn’t always there.
Somewhere along the line balls were being dropped, but the senior Lee didn’t have enough time to address the matter.
The skies over Seoul were peppered with clouds when Byung Chull Lee died of lung cancer on November 20, 1987. Just two weeks later, Byung Chull’s youngest son, Kun-hee, took his place on the family throne to become the Samsung Group’s second chairman.
Kun-hee’s installment as chairman was agreed upon by Byung Chull’s survivors and Samsung Group’s board, but it seemed like a peculiar move to some who peered in from the outside. The late Byung Chull Lee was no fool though, and didn’t suffer them lightly either. When his two elder sons, Lee Maeng-hee and Lee, proved ill-suited for duty he dismissed them outright. “They were unfit for executive positions,” Lee remarked to Time Magazine in 1976. “The life of a man is short, but that of a corporation must never be.”
The Confucian patriarchy that was a hallmark of the chaebol power structure meant that Kun-hee Lee would be the one to ultimately succeed Byung Chull, though the patriarch may have wished otherwise. He was very fond of his eldest daughter Lee In-hee, and reportedly mentioned to his confidants that she would be a shoe-in as his successor if only she was male.
Kun-hee’s first few years as chairman were marked by relative prosperity for the Samsung Group, and Samsung Electronics in particular. Samsung Semiconductors, the purchase which you’ll recall both senior and junior Lees coordinated, had already begun to pay off thanks to the popularity of its DRAM memory chips and became the market leader in 1992, and Samsung Electronics had begun to focus more on research and development in addition to production prowess. That said, there were some problems.
To say that Kun-hee Lee is a character is putting it awfully mildly — his tenure as chairman of the Samsung Group was peppered with overzealous but defining moments that changed the course of the chaebol’s growth. The first took place in 1993, when Lee the junior found himself facing an electronics division that simply wasn’t doing its best work. Lee’s vision was of a Samsung that sat on top of the world’s industries, a vision that didn’t jibe with the slipshod products and careless practices that he saw day in and day out. So what did he do?
He talked, and talked, and talked.
It was a lengthy, impassioned demand for change. His initial, hour-long phone outburst took place on a flight to Frankfurt, and he had his rant recorded so others who weren’t present would be able to heed his words. Upon his arrival in Germany, Lee gathered up some 200 Samsung executives in a hotel and laid out his vision over the course of three days.
“Change everything but your wife and kids,” Lee famously proclaimed. Lee would later prove to be full of such soundbites, but the message was clear — Samsung Electronics was in trouble and the people in that room needed to fix things fast.
His message may have seemed like a powerful one, and some execs surely took it to heart, but it didn’t seem to stick for very long. As the story goes, Lee sent out some of Samsung’s newest mobile phones as New Year’s gifts in 1995 only to be embarrassed when he was informed that they didn’t work the way they were supposed to. Quality had began to slip once more, and Lee was intent on making his earlier edict crystal clear.
With the help of a few of his generals, Kun-hee Lee took it upon himself to play the perfectionist pyrophile. Invoking the flaws that paved the way for the bonfire likening product defects to “cancer,” a grim but fitting metaphor for a subsidiary whose fate could be sealed if its employees and brass didn’t enact some dramatic changes.
After the flames were put out and the debris cleared, Samsung Electronics redoubled its investments in research and development. The installation of a new Electronics CEO, Yun Jong-Yong in December 1996 was meant to put the errant subsidiary on a more ambitious, profitable path.
The shrewd Mr. Yun, a graduate of Seoul National University who also studied at MIT’s Sloan School of Business, also helped navigate Samsung Electronics through one of its most desperate periods. 1997 saw South Korea’s massive chaebols take considerable losses thanks to the Asian financial crisis. In retrospect Samsung weathered the storm better than most despite carrying loads of debt, but Yun was faced with a hell of a task — and was forced to streamline the subsidiary’s operations by selling off nearly $2 billion in corporate assets and temporarily shutting down factories to help Samsung Electronics move through its inventory.
To many of its employees, working for Samsung is a mark of pride. In an effort to further trim costs, Yun laid of 24,000 of them.
It was a trying time for Samsung Electronics. Yun’s efforts helped to solidify the subsidiary’s transition from being a producer of cheap, me-too products to a herald of the bleeding edge. One of the keys, according to Yun, was sheer speed. Without it Samsung Electronics could fall prey to any number of major rivals set on out-innovating and out-producing them. Between that focus on aggressive turn-around times and the thoughtful reinvestment of fund in products and divisions that were seen as potential long-term winners, Samsung Electronics had set the stage for the next decade.
Samsung’s early interest in the nascent semiconductor business allowed it compete in ways that other consumer electronics firms — like Sony — weren’t prepared to. The subsidiary didn’t focus just on finished products, it concerned itself with the electronic building blocks that went into them.
That M.O. speaks to another trait of Samsung Electronics: it doesn’t do much pioneering in unproven spaces. Rather, it picks out markets that have clear traction and try to consistently outperform the players that are already there. Consider the humble TFT-LCD display. Samsung Electronics’ first was produced in the mid-90s, and in the years to come the subsidiary would dump considerable amounts of money into improving production quality, clarity, size, as demand for flat-screen displays grew from the late 90s onward.
And of course, mobile was another one of the those big opportunities. If a strategy based on weighty investments and rapid development helped Samsung stay ahead of its Japanese display rivals, then it helped Samsung take on the world with its mobile devices.
The approach would best be described as “scattershot.” Be they feature phones or Android smartphones, Samsung Electronics has always seen to fit to churn them out at an astonishing rate to see what clicks with consumers. That’s led to a considerable number of one-off devices meant to stand on their own and then disappear after mere months on the market, but hits are inevitable and so are their sequels.
Consider the company’s flagship Galaxy S series, for instance. First introduced in 2010, the Galaxy S was one of the first Android devices to become a runaway success, despite companies like HTC and Motorola having a considerable head start. From there, the typical Samsung drive to iterate kicked in and now, after less than three years, Samsung is already preparing to push its Galaxy S4 out the door and into the world marketplace. One could argue (and some already have) that Samsung’s Galaxy S4 is little more than a software-centric rehash of the model that preceded it, but that’s not really the point.
It’s better than the model that came before it, and it’s being released less than a year since the Galaxy S III came out. Samsung is fighting to maintain its position at the head of the curve through production and development speed — don’t expect that to change any time soon.
The story of Samsung’s humble birth, growth, and dominance of multiple industries reads something like a creation myth, a rags-to-riches story for the ages. Samsung Electronics in particular hit its stride in the years that followed that famous fire, but there’s one more factor that helped propel the subsidiary into the stratosphere and keep it there: the Samsung chaebol’s tremendous stature.
If defects are “a cancer” just as Lee famously proclaimed, then what about the flagrant, repeated violations of the law that seem to punctuate Samsung Electronics’ history? Product defects are one thing, but what of defects of character and ethics? After all, Samsung has flouted its share of Korean and international regulations over the years, often with the help of some prominent chaebol buddies.
Consider this small selection of legal imbroglios that Samsung has been engaged in over the years:
  • In October 2005, Samsung Electronics plead guilty to charges of taking part in a conspiracy to illicitly manipulate the prices of its DRAM memory chips. It was stuck with a $300 million fine for its role in the scheme.
  • In March 2012, Samsung Electronics was fined 14.2 billion won for engaging in a mobile price-fixing scheme (along with LG, Pantech, and others) that saw manufacturers inflating phone prices, and was later fined another 400 million won for obstructing Korea’s Fair Trade Commission investigation of the matter one week later.
  • In August 2012, a California jury found Samsung Electronics guilty of infringing six of Apple’s patents with a variety of mobile devices. Despite vigorous appeals from both sides (Samsung wanted to have the case reconsidered, Apple wanted more money), Judge Lucy Koh upheld the original $1.05 billion fine.
  • In February 2013, Samsung Electronics was found to have delayed reporting a hydrofluoric gas leak at a chip plant in Hwaseong until after one employee had already died. The fine? A scant 1 million won ($923).
And those are just the some of the cases that directly involve Samsung Electronics — the other subsidiaries and the Samsung Group as a whole was responsible for much more. It’s easy enough to ascribe some of these incidents as the work of unscrupulous loners, and that may be the case at least some of the time, but Lee Kun-hee was no paragon of virtue himself. The world would soon discover that the revered chairman had pinned his name to a hefty list of transgressions while helping Samsung become one of the world’s most prolific conglomerates.
Kim Yong Chul, who served as Samsung in-house counsel before leaving the company to write a tell-all tale of corruption, leveled some of the weightiest accusations at his former employer. In late 2007, he participated in televised press conference in which he claimed that Samsung and Chairman Lee had secretly cultivated a 200 billion won slush fund meant primarily to bribe government officials.
An investigation ensued and while the bribery claim didn’t stick, in 2008 Lee stepped down from his inherited post as chairman after being indicted for dodging roughly $120 million in tax payments. At the time he was required to pay a small (for him) fine of $100 million, and was sentenced to three years in prison, a punishment that was quickly suspended. He was ultimately pardoned by President Lee Myung-bak in 2009 so that the Samsung Group chairman could remain a part of International Olympic Committee, and Kun-hee eventually reclaimed his place atop the chaebol in 2010.
The kicker? That’s the second time Lee Kun-hee has received a presidential pardon. The first was back in 1997 for yet another slush fund scandal, this time involving plans to pay off presidential hopefuls.
Despite all that, Kun-hee Lee, Samsung Electronics, and the whole of the Samsung Group walked away with minimal (if any) lasting damage. Its size now is one of Samsung’s greatest assets — it employs hundreds of thousands around the world, and the sheer amount of money it brings in (the Samsung Group accounts for around one-fifth of South Korea’s GDP) it has more than enough financial and political resources to handily deal with whatever comes its way.
In spite of all that Samsung Electronics (and by proxy, the Samsung Group) has grown to truly massive proportions.
Though it needed some swift kicks in the proverbial pants along the way, Samsung Electronics’ rise to the top of the consumer electronics industry is one based on nearly as many questionable practices as good ones. Tremendous production power, a devotion to speed and efficiency, a modicum of measured craziness in its leaders, and the willingness to throw around its amazing weight have all contributed to Samsung’s domination of nearly every industry it’s involved with.
For Samsung, it’s all about thoughtfully applying its brawn, which becomes all the more important when you reach the heights Samsung has. Once you reach the top, you become a target.
There’s a very fine line between being ruthless and being effective, and Samsung seems to have mastered its balancing act.
techcrunch.com